/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/action_controller/layout.rb is in ruby-actionpack-2.3 2.3.14-5.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 | module ActionController #:nodoc:
module Layout #:nodoc:
def self.included(base)
base.extend(ClassMethods)
base.class_eval do
class << self
alias_method_chain :inherited, :layout
end
end
end
# Layouts reverse the common pattern of including shared headers and footers in many templates to isolate changes in
# repeated setups. The inclusion pattern has pages that look like this:
#
# <%= render "shared/header" %>
# Hello World
# <%= render "shared/footer" %>
#
# This approach is a decent way of keeping common structures isolated from the changing content, but it's verbose
# and if you ever want to change the structure of these two includes, you'll have to change all the templates.
#
# With layouts, you can flip it around and have the common structure know where to insert changing content. This means
# that the header and footer are only mentioned in one place, like this:
#
# // The header part of this layout
# <%= yield %>
# // The footer part of this layout
#
# And then you have content pages that look like this:
#
# hello world
#
# At rendering time, the content page is computed and then inserted in the layout, like this:
#
# // The header part of this layout
# hello world
# // The footer part of this layout
#
# NOTE: The old notation for rendering the view from a layout was to expose the magic <tt>@content_for_layout</tt> instance
# variable. The preferred notation now is to use <tt>yield</tt>, as documented above.
#
# == Accessing shared variables
#
# Layouts have access to variables specified in the content pages and vice versa. This allows you to have layouts with
# references that won't materialize before rendering time:
#
# <h1><%= @page_title %></h1>
# <%= yield %>
#
# ...and content pages that fulfill these references _at_ rendering time:
#
# <% @page_title = "Welcome" %>
# Off-world colonies offers you a chance to start a new life
#
# The result after rendering is:
#
# <h1>Welcome</h1>
# Off-world colonies offers you a chance to start a new life
#
# == Automatic layout assignment
#
# If there is a template in <tt>app/views/layouts/</tt> with the same name as the current controller then it will be automatically
# set as that controller's layout unless explicitly told otherwise. Say you have a WeblogController, for example. If a template named
# <tt>app/views/layouts/weblog.erb</tt> or <tt>app/views/layouts/weblog.builder</tt> exists then it will be automatically set as
# the layout for your WeblogController. You can create a layout with the name <tt>application.erb</tt> or <tt>application.builder</tt>
# and this will be set as the default controller if there is no layout with the same name as the current controller and there is
# no layout explicitly assigned with the +layout+ method. Nested controllers use the same folder structure for automatic layout.
# assignment. So an Admin::WeblogController will look for a template named <tt>app/views/layouts/admin/weblog.erb</tt>.
# Setting a layout explicitly will always override the automatic behaviour for the controller where the layout is set.
# Explicitly setting the layout in a parent class, though, will not override the child class's layout assignment if the child
# class has a layout with the same name.
#
# == Inheritance for layouts
#
# Layouts are shared downwards in the inheritance hierarchy, but not upwards. Examples:
#
# class BankController < ActionController::Base
# layout "bank_standard"
#
# class InformationController < BankController
#
# class VaultController < BankController
# layout :access_level_layout
#
# class EmployeeController < BankController
# layout nil
#
# The InformationController uses "bank_standard" inherited from the BankController, the VaultController overwrites
# and picks the layout dynamically, and the EmployeeController doesn't want to use a layout at all.
#
# == Types of layouts
#
# Layouts are basically just regular templates, but the name of this template needs not be specified statically. Sometimes
# you want to alternate layouts depending on runtime information, such as whether someone is logged in or not. This can
# be done either by specifying a method reference as a symbol or using an inline method (as a proc).
#
# The method reference is the preferred approach to variable layouts and is used like this:
#
# class WeblogController < ActionController::Base
# layout :writers_and_readers
#
# def index
# # fetching posts
# end
#
# private
# def writers_and_readers
# logged_in? ? "writer_layout" : "reader_layout"
# end
#
# Now when a new request for the index action is processed, the layout will vary depending on whether the person accessing
# is logged in or not.
#
# If you want to use an inline method, such as a proc, do something like this:
#
# class WeblogController < ActionController::Base
# layout proc{ |controller| controller.logged_in? ? "writer_layout" : "reader_layout" }
#
# Of course, the most common way of specifying a layout is still just as a plain template name:
#
# class WeblogController < ActionController::Base
# layout "weblog_standard"
#
# If no directory is specified for the template name, the template will by default be looked for in <tt>app/views/layouts/</tt>.
# Otherwise, it will be looked up relative to the template root.
#
# == Conditional layouts
#
# If you have a layout that by default is applied to all the actions of a controller, you still have the option of rendering
# a given action or set of actions without a layout, or restricting a layout to only a single action or a set of actions. The
# <tt>:only</tt> and <tt>:except</tt> options can be passed to the layout call. For example:
#
# class WeblogController < ActionController::Base
# layout "weblog_standard", :except => :rss
#
# # ...
#
# end
#
# This will assign "weblog_standard" as the WeblogController's layout except for the +rss+ action, which will not wrap a layout
# around the rendered view.
#
# Both the <tt>:only</tt> and <tt>:except</tt> condition can accept an arbitrary number of method references, so
# #<tt>:except => [ :rss, :text_only ]</tt> is valid, as is <tt>:except => :rss</tt>.
#
# == Using a different layout in the action render call
#
# If most of your actions use the same layout, it makes perfect sense to define a controller-wide layout as described above.
# Sometimes you'll have exceptions where one action wants to use a different layout than the rest of the controller.
# You can do this by passing a <tt>:layout</tt> option to the <tt>render</tt> call. For example:
#
# class WeblogController < ActionController::Base
# layout "weblog_standard"
#
# def help
# render :action => "help", :layout => "help"
# end
# end
#
# This will render the help action with the "help" layout instead of the controller-wide "weblog_standard" layout.
module ClassMethods
# If a layout is specified, all rendered actions will have their result rendered
# when the layout <tt>yield</tt>s. This layout can itself depend on instance variables assigned during action
# performance and have access to them as any normal template would.
def layout(template_name, conditions = {}, auto = false)
add_layout_conditions(conditions)
write_inheritable_attribute(:layout, template_name)
write_inheritable_attribute(:auto_layout, auto)
end
def layout_conditions #:nodoc:
@layout_conditions ||= read_inheritable_attribute(:layout_conditions)
end
def layout_list #:nodoc:
Array(view_paths).sum([]) { |path| Dir["#{path.to_str}/layouts/**/*"] }
end
private
def inherited_with_layout(child)
inherited_without_layout(child)
unless child.name.blank?
layout_match = child.name.underscore.sub(/_controller$/, '').sub(/^controllers\//, '')
child.layout(layout_match, {}, true) unless child.layout_list.grep(%r{layouts/#{layout_match}(\.[a-z][0-9a-z]*)+$}).empty?
end
end
def add_layout_conditions(conditions)
write_inheritable_hash(:layout_conditions, normalize_conditions(conditions))
end
def normalize_conditions(conditions)
conditions.inject({}) {|hash, (key, value)| hash.merge(key => [value].flatten.map {|action| action.to_s})}
end
end
def initialize(*args)
super
@real_format = nil
end
# Returns the name of the active layout. If the layout was specified as a method reference (through a symbol), this method
# is called and the return value is used. Likewise if the layout was specified as an inline method (through a proc or method
# object). If the layout was defined without a directory, layouts is assumed. So <tt>layout "weblog/standard"</tt> will return
# weblog/standard, but <tt>layout "standard"</tt> will return layouts/standard.
def active_layout(passed_layout = nil, options = {})
layout = passed_layout || default_layout
return layout if layout.respond_to?(:render)
active_layout = case layout
when Symbol then __send__(layout)
when Proc then layout.call(self)
else layout
end
find_layout(active_layout, default_template_format, options[:html_fallback]) if active_layout
end
private
def default_layout #:nodoc:
layout = self.class.read_inheritable_attribute(:layout)
return layout unless self.class.read_inheritable_attribute(:auto_layout)
find_layout(layout, default_template_format)
rescue ActionView::MissingTemplate
nil
end
def find_layout(layout, format, html_fallback=false) #:nodoc:
view_paths.find_template(layout.to_s =~ /\A\/|layouts\// ? layout : "layouts/#{layout}", format, html_fallback)
rescue ActionView::MissingTemplate
raise if Mime::Type.lookup_by_extension(format.to_s).html?
end
def pick_layout(options)
if options.has_key?(:layout)
case layout = options.delete(:layout)
when FalseClass
nil
when NilClass, TrueClass
active_layout if action_has_layout? && candidate_for_layout?(:template => default_template_name)
else
active_layout(layout, :html_fallback => true)
end
else
active_layout if action_has_layout? && candidate_for_layout?(options)
end
end
def action_has_layout?
if conditions = self.class.layout_conditions
case
when only = conditions[:only]
only.include?(action_name)
when except = conditions[:except]
!except.include?(action_name)
else
true
end
else
true
end
end
def candidate_for_layout?(options)
template = options[:template] || default_template(options[:action])
if options.values_at(:text, :xml, :json, :file, :inline, :partial, :nothing, :update).compact.empty?
begin
template_object = self.view_paths.find_template(template, default_template_format)
# this restores the behavior from 2.2.2, where response.template.template_format was reset
# to :html for :js requests with a matching html template.
# see v2.2.2, ActionView::Base, lines 328-330
@real_format = :html if response.template.template_format == :js && template_object.format == "html"
!template_object.exempt_from_layout?
rescue ActionView::MissingTemplate
true
end
end
rescue ActionView::MissingTemplate
false
end
def default_template_format
@real_format || response.template.template_format
end
end
end
|